The nation’s story arc involves two opposing forces on course to collide: the fear of personal privacy invasion and the capabilities necessary for the nation’s cyber security.
The consequences resulting from this struggle will majorly influence the personal safety of Americans over the next several years. Let’s take a look at both of these forces.
Privacy: In spite of their willingness to share intimate details of their lives through social media, many Americans are increasingly wary of the media-fueled fears of growing encroachment on personal information by U.S. intelligence agencies.
Steps to curb cyber intelligence gathering have already been taken. Although an existing law forbids warrantless phone tapping, the U.S. Senate recently introduced a measure that would end the NSA’s bulk collection of domestic phone records. NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander has publicly stated that crippling his agency’s spying abilities would be the “wrong decision” for America’s security.
Cyber defenses: Jeffrey Carr, founder of cybersecurity firm Taia Global, sees the Internet as “fast becoming a digital battlefield” as the U.S. faces increasing threats from hacktivists, extremist groups, espionage, and state-sponsored network attacks. The cyber battles wage on for military secrets, intellectual property, economic gain and personal information.
While America’s cyber intelligence capabilities are strong, its cyberattack defenses are demonstrably weak, as shown recently:
- A July demonstration proved that U.S. financial institutions, whose computer networks have been under attack for more than a year, are alarmingly vulnerable to cyberattack.
- The U.S. aviation industry is only now getting serious about even planning for threats from cyberspace.
- Gen. Alexander has given America’s public utilities a “three out of ten” rating in cyberattack defense strength.
It’s understandable that increasing the transparency of America’s cyber intelligence operations would help citizens understand how the NSA operates, hopefully lessening opinions that the U.S. is a “surveillance state.”
But crippling intelligence gathering sets the wrong course, ignoring that the defense of our critical national infrastructures must be a top priority in today’s dangerous environment. Fear of privacy loss appears to be winning the emotional battle in this U.S. psychodrama, but this will prove to be risky thinking.
Privacy is a Myth
Facing major disruptions in electrical power, aircraft safety, and the financial sector, one would think Americans would be more concerned with security than invasion of privacy.
But the obsession continues in spite of the reality: privacy is a myth.
Evidence of this fact is everywhere: cameras on every street corner; Facebook facial recognition software; digital databases filled with personal information; Apple fingerprint libraries; smartphones transmitting our every move. Like it or not, we are living, breathing nodes for information transmission.
Gene Kaspersky, founder of the Internet security firm that bears his name, summed up this reality best: “On the Internet, privacy is dead.”
Will Americans - and our governing institutions – ever let go of the fear of privacy loss and focus on the true problem facing our nation: the ever-increasing threats from cyberspace on our way of life?
It seems our real enemies might be within our very own borders, perpetually fear-mongering to shift the nation’s focus to a pseudo-threat to the detriment of us all. One can only hope that it won’t take a 9/11-scale attack to shift our priorities.
("Gold Scales Of Justice" image: Kittisak/FreeDigitalPhotos.net)